出生\证明
剧情简介
In 1961, Stani;s`:/l+aw Rozewic(z $ creat=)ed -t/he n:ovella film &!qu*:otBir=,@t/;=,h Cer,tifica%te&qu[(ot in co]*operation with:^*! hi%,s broth.`er, Tadue: sz Roze$! ;wicz as screenwrit ??*er. Suc)h br;other [t?an.d-_e)*) ms are rare in th@ e _\:history of film b,]ut aside fro*%m fa @mily t+ies, Stanislaw (_\born i=n 1924) and ^`Taduesz + (born in$ 192_1 ) were mutually bound by thei+)r l_,#ove f`]or the c !inema. They.!_ were!,; born and g - rew up in Ra` domsk, a small tow/ n which had "its madme;n an_d its saints" and@( m%]@ost`+ i*%mportan\(ly, the &qu,)o=%+tKine(=(ma&. =qu$,[ot cinema, as Stanislaw r]e _!=[ca(l*[ls%:: f)`o*`r` him (cinem*_a^ is= "h?^ea[[ven, the whole _ wo!_rld, en%chantment&q^(u(/?ot:.@/#. T^.\$adeusz [,says he` considers cin!@ema/ + both a== char!$mi$=ng market!) stall and;_ a mysteri`\ous temp\%le. &[?\quotAll ]?this savage land has a /lw@=ays attrac /ted .and fascinate*( d me,&q`/@uot he says. &$_quotI am d^-evoure^d ,_by c?i^`+nema ?and*@_ .=I devour )+[cin@)ema I'm a cine. ma ea] te@*.=r.\^&quo?,t Bu(=t Taduesz Rozewic^@z ,,^$# an%\. ##eminen+^;t write*+r, admits this u)niq,$ue form of cooperatio+;\:n wa?^s\\ a problem t;o [him: "It is the pre)% !sen-ce of th:+?;e other ^\=$person n[ot onl;y in^ the proce\ss$ ..@o$ f writi[,ng, b%ut at its ve =^r* $y core, which is inserperable for: me from ab/so@ lute s+[-olitude." Som?e +scenes , $the brothers wrot`%e tog ether others were /=cre.]ated$ b%y the wr% ]it: ^?er hi]!mself, :following discussions with the di+rect or. But )from the +!(perspe` /ctive of time, it is "Birth Certi*%!=ficatequot,(? rather t%#@,han &q +uotEcho" or &q$[u\otThe - ;;Wicke\,d Gate&q-uot, `-that Taduesz describes as his m`(/ost intimate film))[. [\`;This is unde;rstandable. : #The tradg,*ey from S#,_e)ptember 19!$39 in Poland ` was for the Roz-ewicz brot ?hers their per#)sona)l/ &qu otb-;irth, certificat;e#,[&quo@,t.:] When. worki@ n g o(=^n !+-#@the film, the director said "This time( * it is all _ about sha +king off, gett@ing rid of the p,\`/syc %h#_$-ological burden which).+ the war :[,w(^as for all$ of us.] ... Cooperation with my brother was in this case /;`e_::asier, as .we shar*e many /war[ ) m.$emories. (#We / ^^wanted t//o sho ?w to@ ; adul ?t v-#/iewer_-s a_ pic)ture of war a s s(^een by a chil$!d. ...# In rea-lit ](-y, it is the adults who created-)% the=@ rea] )l w/^orld +of mass?:acres. Chil)`dren beheld , t;=(he horrors +coming back to [_?l+/ife,`@ exhume$d +_ from un:d*[erneat%@%. h ?\;the groun *$ d, overw_h elmin], /g the earth;." @:Th.\_e princ%(iple o\_f c=,$ompos@?ition of &qu.`otBirth Certifica.@te" is not _)obvious. Wh%^en w()a[tching a novel^ =:la fi(:lm,#)= we tend` =%# to[-. think in ?terms of tradi ti# .^onal theatre. W;e expect th\)at a min;-i)*ature story #[[-w=i- =ll finis; h with a sharp poi(nt th e thr+]ee: film nove $llas in =!Rozewicz&[ [,#=%39s wor$k lack :th`is feature. We do not ;know what_) will b`-e hap_+;pe/,n ?):to the boy ma king his alo.ne through the fores #t towards the= end of &qu/$otOn t):h_e +_Road&q\@_uot. We do not know whe(t\]%he; r in,[ "Lett+\:er from the Ca*\mp", \the #help$@ ; offered by ?(the small @heroes to :$a Soviet prisoner] will ? rescue him .] from the unknown fate of his compatrio*%_ts+. The fate o? f the J+ewish+( girl from &q]]uotD?)`r op o-f B\ [lood] ,&`\quot is==\ also unclear. W!?i#ll she keep? her% ) *new i%-\mperson]a- tion as "((@?Mar*,$-ysi#a _Malinowska"? Or will th-e Nazi`]s make h+er into a$? repr?,esentative %of@] the ,"Nord !ic #%race"? Those questions were%$ /asked by the direc\tor for a r;!% ,eas\)on`]]. He prec_ eived. war as chao\^s and perdition, and not as line$-ar history [@,that c-/ ould be reflec)ted in.:. a plot. Although "Birt*`!=h Cer+[tificate&?.!quot @is ` ? satu% rated w .ith moral\ c% `ontent, it does not ai-*]/m to be a moralit?_%`y pla)[[y. But with the im$mense press\ure o^=?f reality, no vari;ent of fa+t/_e should be exclud@)ed. T*@his appro%:ac)hed ca n# b.]e compared$ wth- Krzyszto\f *%Kieslow. ski,_9s "Blind Ch#\a,nce&q^?uot 25 years later, wh$ich pictured dramat$;i\:c choices? of a *different era. The film$ novella "On the Road" has a very s paring /p lot, but it !-`drew spec^ia$ l atte!ntio`n of t%he revi?)]e=*w$/er `;;.s. The ominati*ng o vertone \of the war fil _ms created by the Polis,!``h Film S@[chool at that time shoul+ ?\d :,[ be kept in mind. Mainly o,?] wing to Wajda, those films :!dea/*lt w @it(,h rom%antic herita(ge.^? They were pe, rmeated with)# pathos, bitterness, and/=; irony. Rozewicz ) is an ext@raordina$ ry-) a+rti[$st. Wh` en narrating a *?!st# ory abo\u-t a boy lost in(- a] war zone, carry?ing some )^doc($uments from t``he reg :iment office as i f the#)#y were a t$_reasure., the narra\tor i/ n &quo ;-)]tOn the Road&quo